The program that we will absolve concerns six different themes that are connected each other. This is a list of these themes with which we will do – and also we’ll ask to anyone likes to agree with these subjects - our research, analysis and critics.
1. multiple identity and hybrids
- architects with different origins respect to the place in which they works; Architects Office in which works different people with different cultural origins; online co-operations between different people with different stories.
Then:
- occident like “cultural subject”: a complex unity that includes both America and Europe (America Latina too) that is defined by differences. The impetus to come back to the origins move their limits.
2. a non provincial place
- the world is one, but with a lot of incompatible differences.
- It’s necessary to recover a constitutive contamination that can give travel to new lines, any tentative to come back at the local born Identity means a violent refuse of reality that is 2500 years old. Anyway it isn’t a superstitious excitement the contents that the modern age has given and exercised.
3. reason and “the other”
the reason that describes “the other” really speaks about itself, but doing it represents a translation of the other’s truth, making a misunderstanding. You can’t resume the human differences in a universal concept. But there is a possible truth inside the project of objectivity.
4. new country
we will investigate the east countries, the middle and the Extreme East too. Some of these countries, like Estonia, Poland, Byelorussia, Slovenia are places in which researches with great interest emerges.
5. thirty years old generation
the generation of people between 30 and 40 years old was already discovered and now are under reflectors. This work is certainly important but in some cases it produces the opposite result. There’s a risk to obscure, to ignore, to ostracize a new generation of professional people that are putting their attention to many different themes like, for example, a right attention to ecology.
6. after the star system / transfer and metamorphosis
you can agree to assert that if today we can take distance from alphabetical writing and you can get it object of our lessons and investigations, you can do it because other means of communications and expressions, and also a lot of new technologies are begin to dominate. Moreover you can consider that a simple movement of an object into a new contest, seems to be different and requested new changes. How will space, light, subject, etc. change for us men and architects of the year 2000? What will be the sense of these metaphors that will have a sure metamorphosis? In fact, there are no “space”, “light”, “subject”, as you mean. If men represents their own projects, which target can men reach? How is it possible to make men feel sure as there is no certainty all over the world? Which will be new possibility for us? Maybe The Star System is not able to do these questions.



